A new bill aimed at addressing border security while providing financial aid to Ukraine and Israel has sparked concern and encouragement among U.S. Senator John Cornyn and fellow Republicans. During a policy panel discussion held in downtown San Antonio, Cornyn, along with senators from Montana, North Carolina, and Louisiana, expressed their thoughts on the $118 billion bipartisan bill negotiated by Senator James Lankford of Oklahoma. However, the bill has faced criticism from top House Republican leaders, including Speaker Mike Johnson, who declared it would be “dead on arrival.”
Cornyn highlighted the urgency of the situation in Texas, referring to it as ground zero for the overwhelmed border communities. He emphasized the strain on the state’s taxpayers and the need for the federal government to step in with effective measures. While Cornyn could not definitively state his position on the bill, as he had not yet reviewed the entire 370-page document, he expressed apprehension about President Biden’s utilization of the proposed legislation and its potential impact on the ongoing humanitarian crisis.
Under the bill, the federal government would be granted expulsion authority if the average number of migrant crossings reaches at least 5,000 in a week. President Biden has stated that this authority would be used to effectively shut down the border. Additionally, the legislation aims to expedite the asylum process from years to six months and create a new process for the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services to decide asylum claims without involving the courts.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer acknowledged the gravity of the situation and commended the collaboration between himself and Leader McConnell, despite their usual disagreements on various issues. As the monumental legislation approaches its Wednesday vote, reservations remain among senators like Cornyn. However, there is still hope among lawmakers that substantial action can be taken to enhance border security.
Senator Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, who is still analyzing the bill, sees potential benefits in the long run. He estimated that, under this legislation, the number of people crossing into the United States illegally in December could have been reduced from 300,000 to 100,000. Cornyn echoed the sentiment, stating that the crucial question is whether this bill offers a better solution than the current status quo.
The League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) has called for the government to close the border to migrants who do not pass through legal checkpoints, marking the first time the organization has made such a demand. LULAC National President Domingo Garcia emphasized the need for bipartisan action on immigration reform without political games, stressing the importance of including Latino communities in decision-making processes.
In a written statement, Garcia expressed LULAC’s support for legal migration, assistance to genuine refugees, and aid to source nations. The organization urges Congress to work together for meaningful immigration reform, highlighting the need to halt illegal activities such as human trafficking, drug smuggling, and unauthorized refugee entries.
The debate surrounding the bill continues, with lawmakers grappling with its complexities and potential impact. The Wednesday vote will determine whether this legislation becomes a significant step forward in addressing border security and immigration reform.