Health clinic offers patients alternative to government overreach in healthcare

New “Freedom-Based” Health Care Clinic in Florida Challenges Conventional Medical Practices

In the serene coastal city of Venice on Florida’s west coast, a groundbreaking health care clinic is causing quite a stir. The “We the People Health and Wellness Center,” a self-proclaimed “freedom-based” establishment, is redefining the concept of medical freedom. Co-owner Tanya Parus, in an interview with Investigative Reporter Katie LaGrone, passionately explained that medical freedom at their clinic means having the autonomy to make personal healthcare decisions without feeling pressured or coerced. Parus, a dedicated mother and former EMT, was inspired to open the primary care facility after witnessing the fear and apprehension gripping individuals during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Parus is also an active member of the conservative group “Moms for America” and played a pivotal role in the grassroots right-wing movement that gained momentum in Sarasota County during the pandemic. Her involvement in helping parents secure waivers exempting their children from wearing masks in schools drew attention and support from over 3,000 people. Many of these families have now become patients at her clinic, where they receive medical care from the very same doctors and nurses who supported their cause.

The We the People Health and Wellness Center is adorned with images of the American flag and symbols representing freedom and liberty. A replica of the Constitution takes center stage in the main hallway, symbolizing the clinic’s commitment to its namesake. Parus adamantly denies any political motivations behind these displays, emphasizing that their purpose is to represent the fundamental value of freedom.

While the clinic’s approach has garnered a dedicated following, it has also faced criticism and skepticism from mainstream media. During LaGrone’s visit, a photographer continuously filmed the proceedings, despite a doctor’s request to halt the recording. This incident highlights the challenges the clinic faces in gaining trust and combating public scrutiny.

In an era where political rhetoric often intertwines with healthcare, We the People Health and Wellness Center offers an alternative to government-controlled medical practices. The clinic operates on a subscription-based model, with patients paying a monthly fee instead of relying on insurance coverage. Notably, the clinic welcomes the use of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, drugs often championed by conservative factions but not approved by the FDA for COVID-19 treatment. Conversely, the clinic does not offer medically proven vaccinations of any kind, stating that they do not administer flu shots or any childhood vaccines. Parus clarifies that the clinic provides informed consent to patients regarding its policies and practices and offers referrals to the local health department for vaccinations upon request.

The doctors at We the People Health and Wellness Center have experienced their fair share of controversy. Dr. Renata Moon, the clinic’s pediatrician, claims to have spent her entire career advocating for traditional childhood vaccines. However, her critical views on the COVID-19 vaccine led to questioning, investigation, and ultimately the non-renewal of her contract by Washington State University. Moon asserts that she and other doctors at the clinic face both silencing and threats due to their views. Another doctor at the clinic, Dr. Michelle Scott, was recruited after being fired from an urgent care center for refusing to wear a mask during the pandemic. Scott openly expresses anti-vaccine sentiments on her personal website, which also features government criticism and unproven treatments for COVID-19.

Despite the controversies surrounding the clinic, many patients embrace its natural and less government-oriented approach to healthcare. Richard, an 86-year-old patient, adamantly proclaims that he will never take a vaccine again, citing his belief that altering what God has created is unnecessary. Steve Martin Smith, who had not visited a doctor in 20 years before joining the clinic with his wife, expresses his distrust in insurance companies and appreciates the clinic’s alternative perspective.

However, Dr. Steven Rosenberg, a Florida dermatologist who leads a state panel responsible for determining disciplinary actions against doctors, raises concerns about the clinic’s practices. While he acknowledges that the clinic operates within legal boundaries, he questions whether their standards align with the accepted standard of care. Rosenberg worries that vulnerable individuals may be taken advantage of due to their lack of sophistication in discerning appropriate treatments.

As the debate surrounding We the People Health and Wellness Center continues, Tanya Parus invites skeptics to visit the clinic and see for themselves. She urges individuals to keep an open mind, emphasizing that differing opinions should not be dismissed as quackery. Whether the clinic is truly providing a unique alternative or exploiting vulnerable patients remains a subject of ongoing scrutiny.

In conclusion, the We the People Health and Wellness Center challenges conventional medical practices with its commitment to medical freedom and alternative healthcare approaches. As the clinic faces both praise and criticism, the public remains divided on the effectiveness and ethics of their methods. Only time will reveal the true impact and sustainability of this controversial healthcare model.

Related Articles

Back to top button